From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Full view of a private partial view cannot be a subtype
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 19:03:11 +0100
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net;
 news.eternal-september.org
Message-ID: <p09bd0$3qs$1@dont-email.me>
References: <c6ba70e3-bfd0-42ca-b742-dc472965eea0@googlegroups.com>
 <p00p3c$o7s$1@dont-email.me>
 <889a3aed-4e6b-49c8-8c1c-6f1478e8e077@googlegroups.com>
 <p01229$hqn$1@dont-email.me>
 <dd1b71a7-9bfb-4f7c-8109-bb06f54505b4@googlegroups.com>
 <p042na$kle$1@dont-email.me>
 <a7bf5393-98ed-4a52-84d3-c4e1931da83b@googlegroups.com>
 <p04frg$q8n$1@dont-email.me>
 <c6fef139-6718-4c05-8791-897e995bdb4c@googlegroups.com>
 <p06p76$rd$1@dont-email.me>
 <c3783cb2-552f-484d-9036-ea7bcb199b9a@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:03:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="cfff211b4850dce60921a9adc1443161";
	logging-data="3932"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8YUYPW9UzEXJ7z9sOU4gDDHKDw8cSDik="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.0
In-Reply-To: <c3783cb2-552f-484d-9036-ea7bcb199b9a@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FGjYP8Qw7krFrT07t4sXMQJKsmY=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49396
Date: 2017-12-06T19:03:11+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 12/06/2017 01:54 PM, Jere wrote:
>>
> I don't think we will ever agree on this topic, because, having grown up as
> someone with trouble reading, I had to find alternate methods to parse
> through what I saw.  It's easy to get overwhelmed when there is so much
> to read/go through.  What's readable to you isn't necessarily readable to me.

S/W is too important for those who are busy creating new buffer-overflow errors 
to be allowed to do it. If we're lucky, that will change. If it does, when we're 
applying for approval, I'd think that a history of violating S/W-engineering 
principles would not be a selling point.

> Hopefully we can just agree to disagree.

Not going to happen. You'll come around to my way of thinking or I shall taunt 
you a second time.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"I fart in your general direction."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
05