From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Full view of a private partial view cannot be a subtype
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:22:42 -0600
Organization: JSA Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <p06v6i$20s$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
References: <c6ba70e3-bfd0-42ca-b742-dc472965eea0@googlegroups.com>
 <p00p3c$o7s$1@dont-email.me>
 <889a3aed-4e6b-49c8-8c1c-6f1478e8e077@googlegroups.com>
 <p01229$hqn$1@dont-email.me>
 <dd1b71a7-9bfb-4f7c-8109-bb06f54505b4@googlegroups.com>
 <p042na$kle$1@dont-email.me>
 <a7bf5393-98ed-4a52-84d3-c4e1931da83b@googlegroups.com>
 <p04frg$q8n$1@dont-email.me>
 <c6fef139-6718-4c05-8791-897e995bdb4c@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:22:42 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk;
 posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226";
	logging-data="2076"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49385
Date: 2017-12-05T14:22:42-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jere" <jhb.chat@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:c6fef139-6718-4c05-8791-897e995bdb4c@googlegroups.com...
> On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 4:48:34 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
...
> I respect yall's view on this, but in either case it is still a subjective
> matter.  There are a variety of people out there who all view things very
> differently.

Jeff's opinion on type extension seems to be the most extreme here on c.l.a 
so that isn't surprising. (Full discloser: I'm probably the second-most 
extreme.)


                              Randy.