From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: G. B. <nonlegitur@nmhp.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to access an array using two different indexing schemes
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 19:31:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <ovpmb7$o7j$1@dont-email.me>
References: <d8c0ce45-97ad-4475-b3f9-1662a875a576@googlegroups.com>
 <e3a1f97e-7cbd-4327-aef6-c18ca9e74bc2@googlegroups.com>
 <ovidu5$eip$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <ac428886-d567-4692-b8b7-22fcb69a755f@googlegroups.com>
 <0b6bd27e-e9ec-4854-bbb1-85e1d9ac92e1@googlegroups.com>
 <227d5a7f-6d5b-4b76-ac31-7d15bb6dc284@googlegroups.com>
 <ovn6uq$rdm$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <16c980c2-1fa6-4084-97ea-b576c75b99c3@googlegroups.com>
 <3ca6a682-9af1-40e3-a4ac-db739b38e4d7@googlegroups.com>
 <8a31c728-0261-4f41-b82e-e7128369ebc1@googlegroups.com>
 <f8ak08F916jU1@mid.individual.net>
 <6c5efd03-6dfe-4024-9c28-b4460006ed39@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 19:31:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="1d9b89e0529dbd62acf8ce9c3884f165";
	logging-data="24819"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19LbmW+N3euwMPvMiNOTcA6WKrsbVXubXw="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bcy0WZFOtD6CMc4eyHpw362+fOo=
	sha1:mhl84cuIaLZTCf73gtOLoER10Fg=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49277
Date: 2017-11-30T19:31:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 30. November 2017 15:47:40 UTC+1 schrieb Niklas Holsti:
>> Perhaps the next Ada revision could extend 4.6(5/2) to include a type 
>> conversion in a renaming, as a view conversion?
> 
> I sent this request to Ada Comment.
> 

Isn‘t a type conversion potentially copying?