From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Instantiations of a generic with often encountered arguments
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 02:04:13 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <ovd0dt$hmi$1@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edFHTOfx8phAphItWrZ8cQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49155
Date: 2017-11-26T02:04:13+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Is it a good practice to declare "centralized" (that is in the same package 
as a generic packages is defined in, or in a child unit) instantiations of a 
generic package with common (that is often encountered, such as Integer, 
String, etc.) generic parameters?

In C++ this is not a problem, because there a template is instantiated 
whenever one needs it. But what's about Ada?

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org