From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Robin" <robin51@dodo.com.au>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: More reliable compilers (of some programming langauges) than GNAT
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 02:14:21 +1100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <ov6oh1$2o8$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <ov1fg0$15sq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Reply-To: "Robin" <robin1@dodo.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: zgURL8BkmJu8LEkj1uTL5Q.user.gioia.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Priority: 3
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 171123-0, 23/11/2017), Outbound message
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49115
Date: 2017-11-24T02:14:21+11:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Victor Porton" <porton@narod.ru> wrote in message news:ov1fg0$15sq$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> Ada is good.
>
> But I have caught a few GNAT bugs while writing my software. It is too bad.
>
> Would you recommend me another language (not Ada) which has a quality free
> compiler?
>
> I need linking with C (like Ada Convention=>C), threads, containers library,
> and if possible reliability.
>
> Maybe should I switch to C++? Is C++ compiler more reliable than GNAT?
>
> I also heard of D and Swift. Huh?
>
> Java?
>
> Or (oh, oh, oh) plain C?

For a quality compiler, consider IBM's PL/I compiler.
However, it is not free. 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus