From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Victor Porton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: More reliable compilers (of some programming langauges) than GNAT Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 17:07:35 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: edFHTOfx8phAphItWrZ8cQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49031 Date: 2017-11-21T17:07:35+02:00 List-Id: Ada is good. But I have caught a few GNAT bugs while writing my software. It is too bad. Would you recommend me another language (not Ada) which has a quality free compiler? I need linking with C (like Ada Convention=>C), threads, containers library, and if possible reliability. Maybe should I switch to C++? Is C++ compiler more reliable than GNAT? I also heard of D and Swift. Huh? Java? Or (oh, oh, oh) plain C? -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org