From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Comparing Access Types Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:25:46 -0600 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 22:25:46 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="9554"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49022 Date: 2017-11-20T16:25:46-06:00 List-Id: "Robert A Duff" wrote in message news:wcclgj3z1of.fsf@TheWorld.com... > "Randy Brukardt" writes: ... > As you pointed out, access values need not be represented as addresses, > so how could you expect converting addresses to access values > to make any sense at all (unless of course, the implementation > makes promises that go beyond the Ada RM)? We never wanted to, but it seems that about 90% of Ada 83 programmers expected that to work (and a large % still do). In Ada 95, of course, we have Access_to_Address_Conversions (or is that Address_to_Access_Conversions - never remember which... :-) Still, getting people to use that is like pulling their teeth. Randy.