From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: some trivial questions? Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:22:23 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <6a5368c5-f015-4dcb-9291-e77b40fa1bf1@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: MyFhHs417jM9AgzRpXn7yg.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49013 Date: 2017-11-20T09:22:23+01:00 List-Id: On 20/11/2017 06:40, J-P. Rosen wrote: > Le 18/11/2017 à 10:19, Dmitry A. Kazakov a écrit : >> Sure, nothing useful going to happen for Ada. But speaking of >> alternatives, another one is to make illegal use-clauses that cause hiding. > No use clause can cause hiding, except for mutual hiding which is a good > thing: if a name is potentially ambiguous, the user has to tell which > one is intended. This is what I meant. If hiding occurs the program would be illegal unless the user provides a renaming for each conflicting name. This must be the rule for all similar cases too. Each name space must be forcibly kept consistent. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de