From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Victor Porton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada-text_io.ads & text_io.ads Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 02:33:54 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <57ce6064-00f1-42b8-9972-1c1fe7fcd6f8@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: edFHTOfx8phAphItWrZ8cQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48972 Date: 2017-11-18T02:33:54+02:00 List-Id: Shark8 wrote: > On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 4:38:17 PM UTC-7, Victor Porton wrote: >> Why on my Debian Linux installation (with GNAT 7.2.0 installed) there is >> no file ada-text_io.ads (which as it seems should be) but there is >> text_io.ads (which should be not)? > > > Text_IO.ads is, IIRC, a renaming of Ada.Text_IO. (It might be the other > way.) This was a concession to Ada 83 compatibility with the > advent/introduction of hierarchical library packages. But this does not answer the question why there is no ada-text_io.ads files. -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org