From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed.datemas.de!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Comparing Access Types Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:21:00 -0600 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <0e68d62f-6e81-4f48-998f-cccdb4c650a1@googlegroups.com> Injection-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 01:21:03 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="16764"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48929 Date: 2017-11-15T19:21:00-06:00 List-Id: "Jere" wrote in message news:0e68d62f-6e81-4f48-998f-cccdb4c650a1@googlegroups.com... ... > I may not understand, but I don't see this as any issue. Even when > physical > memory is split into pages, banks, segments, etc., it can be organized > into > unique locations. I'm not suggesting that access values need to map > directly > to memory addresses but it seems odd that an access type, which holds some > unique information about an object, cannot be ordered in some fashion. Flattening segmented memory would be expensive to implement (in general requiring expensive protected system calls) and it doesn't seem useful (as Bob noted), especially if something is moving objects around. Randy.