From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Does variable creation need Elaborate_Body?
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:17:29 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <oug83n$lk5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <oug7nc$l68$1@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edFHTOfx8phAphItWrZ8cQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48902
Date: 2017-11-15T04:17:29+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

And what if we replace "V: Integer;" with "V: Integer := 11;"?

Victor Porton wrote:
> package X is
> 
>   -- pragma Elaborate_Body;
> 
>   function F return Integer;
> 
>   procedure Init;
> 
> end X;
> 
> package body X is
> 
>   V: Integer;
> 
>   function F return Integer is
>   begin
>     return V;
>   end;
> 
>   procedure Init is
>   begin
>     V := 123;
>   end;
> 
> end X;
> 
> -------------------
> 
> Does the above program need Elaborate_Body pragma for elaboration of "V:
> Integer;"?
> 
> Intuitively, "V: Integer;" does nothing. But it is a declaration which
> needs to be elaborated.
> 
> Does it elaborate correctly without Elaborate_Body?
> 
-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org