From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: RM with accepted changes, available? Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:27:33 -0600 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 23:27:34 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="31671"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48893 Date: 2017-11-14T17:27:33-06:00 List-Id: "Niklas Holsti" wrote in message news:f5bsfnF6q1dU1@mid.individual.net... > On 17-10-25 01:58 , Randy Brukardt wrote: >> (For instance, the recent ARG meeting >> that gave me this nasty flu, It turns out that I didn't have the flu and I didn't get it from the ARG meeting or most likely the associated travel. After 11 days in the hospital and following recovery, I'm now just getting back to (some) work. >> ... approved the "delta aggregate" AI. But it >> probably will get some changes as bugs are discovered, and it may be a >> long >> time before it appears in implementations.) > > Yes, it may. However, as it happens, a recent e-mail from AdaCore says > that delta aggregates are supported in the pre-release of GNAT Pro 18.0, > now available to customers for evaluation. That's probably not implemented exactly as described by the AI/future Standard, since we just finished work on it a few days before the date of this message. Also, experience shows that these early implementations are often full of bugs (usually, the first few ACATS tests for a feature show *lots* of problems). So I wouldn't depend too much on those features yet - they'll probably change some before being "right". Randy.