From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Comparing version numbers Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:10:50 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lKHBldubgAWx1EqbQpQ5LQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48845 Date: 2017-11-13T09:10:50+01:00 List-Id: On 13/11/2017 03:39, Victor Porton wrote: > Not sure if it is quite on-topic, because it is more about general > programming ideas rather than about Ada. (However, a solution in Python or > Ruby or JavaScript would more likely used regexps than Ada.) I doubt regular expressions would help here, or any other kind of text patterns language. It is not a pattern matching problem. > Suppose I have two version numbers of a software. I need to check which of > the two is greater. > > Lexical order string comparison does not work: > > "2.3" vs "11.4". > > I could split it by "." and compare the numbers. But a component of a > version numbers may be nonnumeric like: > > "1.2beta". > > What to do? Is it what you are looking for: http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de/ada/strings_edit.htm#11 > It should work for example for all Debian packages containing interpreters > (for example, "2.7" for "python" package). AFAIK, Debian's dh-make has somewhere an operation to compare versions the way apt does. I don't remember where. but it is there. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de