From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5412c98a3943e746
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.231.138 with SMTP id tg10mr2551567pbc.7.1331729981592;
        Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 h9ni25176pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: REAL
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:59:51 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <ou81y5gru8zh$.1xdmyyyolu0u3$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <op.v91cleyiule2fv@douda-yannick> <jj3p5v$2tp$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <9207716.776.1331054644462.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynaz38>
 <nhzeozam35it$.13mzx8ap4cmdc$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.wascesqrule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <4edda5mav3cf$.149pbgyxl1wx5.dlg@40tude.net>
 <9rplcgF5a2U1@mid.individual.net>
 <1psd0g0womgxi.1sle7ol12x3d5.dlg@40tude.net>
 <9rsahhFmr3U1@mid.individual.net> <ezfn0og1qfov.14k34sxoky5ke.dlg@40tude.net>
 <9rvdjvFfa8U1@mid.individual.net> <4pp58h1br5sp$.yylr20e5vzxb.dlg@40tude.net>
 <9s1s7tF6pcU1@mid.individual.net>
 <1oln2mjlozzh5$.1mxrd97lrgndo.dlg@40tude.net>
 <9s4mseFuoaU1@mid.individual.net> <v18znvc2u2sk.aqnplls3016g.dlg@40tude.net>
 <9sb3l3Fs4oU1@mid.individual.net>
 <4f6063b7$0$6642$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1203141202570.28027@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-03-14T13:59:51+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:14:05 +0100, stefan-lucks@see-the.signature wrote:

> Hardly anyone cares enough to analyze how the error grows from operation 
> to operation. Hardly anyone even bothers to define how close the result 
> should to be -- which depends on the application at hand, of course. 

It is largely the hardware to blame. When the machine rounds, it is more
difficult to keep track on precision, comparing to a truncating machine (in
either direction).

Of course, interval arithmetic should have replaced IEEE long ago. But
nobody cares.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de