From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: some trivial questions? Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 17:58:06 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <6a5368c5-f015-4dcb-9291-e77b40fa1bf1@googlegroups.com> <39330489-ec8b-481f-bcff-a5b7d1a2d8e3@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: MajGvm9MbNtGBKE7r8NgYA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48783 Date: 2017-11-09T17:58:06+01:00 List-Id: On 2017-11-09 16:36, AdaMagica wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 09:49:40 UTC+1 schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov: >>>> Yes. E.g. what if nested package instantiation would not imply "with"? >>>> Should the similar [flawed] logic apply here as to "use"? >>> >>> I don't understand those questions. >> >> package Foo is new Bar; >> use Foo; -- That must be illegal >> >> Now the "right" way: >> >> package Foo is new Bar; >> with Foo; -- For the sake of "showing dependencies" >> use Foo; -- That's right! > > But that's weird. > > declare > package P is ... end P; > with P; -- You really want this? Bah! > use P; As weird as with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de