From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: some trivial questions? Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:41:40 +0100 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: <6a5368c5-f015-4dcb-9291-e77b40fa1bf1@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 17:41:40 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ba02d528e81c6718404bce1ae5de2e2c"; logging-data="13541"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mTejNWWsSlFlPeSEAsjHINnHnJVn0mkE=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Cancel-Lock: sha1:T8whIBWJ6Q/NPfGb0mEHMIHKc4E= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48758 Date: 2017-11-07T18:41:40+01:00 List-Id: On 11/06/2017 11:37 PM, Robert A Duff wrote: > > Not really. I'd prefer that both things be called "procedure". > Then we wouldn't need the terms "function" and "subprogram". > But we'd still need a distinction between procedures that > return a value and those that don't. Yes, but then we'd have something like "procedure" for both, "value-returning procedure" for those that return a value, and "non-value-returning procedure" for those that don't return a value. "Subprogram", "function", and "procedure" seems preferable. -- Jeff Carter "Why don't you bore a hole in yourself and let the sap run out?" Horse Feathers 49