From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Tests in a software release
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:30:58 +0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <osqoph$1ves$1@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8U0x309/ia0QUzusgm/krA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48589
Date: 2017-10-25T22:30:58+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Do you agree that a release (that is software for which debugging was 
finished) should have integer overflow tests but not array out of bounds 
tests (because array out of bounds is always a programming error, but 
integer overflow may happen in an innocent program)?

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org