From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: RM with accepted changes, available? Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:58:14 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 22:58:16 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="5198"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48580 Date: 2017-10-24T17:58:14-05:00 List-Id: Someone notes the correct page for "accepted changes". We only consider changes "accepted" once they are in an Ada Standard (with the exception of bug fixes, these are classed "Binding Interpretations"; the last one was the 2015 Corrigendum). Otherwise, there is no consise list since everything is technically still subject to change. (For instance, the recent ARG meeting that gave me this nasty flu, approved the "delta aggregate" AI. But it probably will get some changes as bugs are discovered, and it may be a long time before it appears in implementations.) [The current target for a new Standard is 2020.] There is a draft ARM with all of the changes that are finished, the individual AIs, and most of our other work artifacts on Ada-Auth.org. Browse around to find what you need. Randy Brukardt, ARG Editor. "Victor Porton" wrote in message news:osg86r$jpk$1@gioia.aioe.org... > Victor Porton wrote: > >> Is there anywhere RM2012 containing accepted changes to the standard? >> >> It would be very inconvenient to review all changes manually. I want all >> in one document. > > Or at least, where on the Web to look for the list of all accepted changes > to RM2012? > > -- > Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org