From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Storage pools and generic access types Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:50:26 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 00:50:26 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="26274"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48536 Date: 2017-10-20T19:50:26-05:00 List-Id: Yes, of course. - Randy "Victor Porton" wrote in message news:orrh9b$p3d$1@gioia.aioe.org... > Suppose we have a generic package with an access type argument. > > Do I assume correctly that "new" in the generic package will use > 'Storage_Pool if it is specified for the access type given as generic > argument? > > -- > Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org