From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Lundin?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why does Ada compile slower than Python? Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:34:10 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <87mv4pvu2s.fsf@nightsong.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:34:09 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="751503afb4733815881d17cb2b6eabc2"; logging-data="24188"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ADRBEPQhRtQxpXGCAYIHL" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:CwfJ+w4ywh1lwPUx2h6IZvlVzvs= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48501 Date: 2017-10-18T09:34:10+02:00 List-Id: On 2017-10-18 09:13, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > Another contributor is catastrophic performance of GNU linker. It takes > about an hour just to link a large stand-alone library. He, that is one reason we left ObjectAda (7.2 I think) on Windows 12 years ago. It could take longer than so to link our executables With gnat, it was fantastic, linking went down to a couple of minutes. And still is, even if the exe-size is between 70 and 200 mb on 32bit Aix (ppc), 32-bit Win (intel) and 64-bit Linux (intel) How large is your library? But on the pi - yes it takes quite som time. But a modern Pi has is roughly the same umpf as a 2002-server, -- -- Björn