From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f4e8127f6a9fd3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: David Brown <dlbrown@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Renaming entries?
Date: 1999/02/17
Message-ID: <os4sokzmo6.fsf@dt022n82.san.rr.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 445483168
Sender: davidb@dt022n82.san.rr.com
References: <7aelgt$2hr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <7afc1p$3mi$3@plug.news.pipex.net>
X-Trace: news.san.rr.com 919290793 204.210.11.130 (Wed,
 17 Feb 1999 14:33:13 PDT)
Organization: very little.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 14:33:13 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com> writes:


> So, the solution to your problem is to use
> 
>    pragma Convention(Entry,Fred);

RM95 6.3.1(14):
Of these four conventions, only Ada and Intrinsic are allowed as a
convention_identifier in a pragma Convention, Import, or Export.

My suggestion would be to wrap it in a procedure and then use a pragma
Inline if you care about the call overhead.  You won't be able to use
select with this, however.

David Brown