From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to make tasks to run in parallel Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:29:00 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lKHBldubgAWx1EqbQpQ5LQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48486 Date: 2017-10-17T09:29:00+02:00 List-Id: On 17/10/2017 06:58, reinert wrote: > I would prefer to enter data via entry/accept. But is it possible > without giving up parallel processing? I feel it is something I should > understand better here :-) select accept run1(a : in real) do x := a; -- Store parameter and let the caller go end run1; for I in 1 .. N loop -- Do the work concurrently x := x + Real(I)/Real(N); x := 0.5*x + 1.0 + sin(x)*cos(x) + sin(x) + cos(x) + sin(x)*sin(x) + cos(x)*cos(x); end loop; new_line;Put("test2 x:");Put (x,4,16,0); New_Line (1); or terminate; -- Exit if the parent does end select; First, as others mentioned, you should not do concurrent work in the rendezvous. Second, add "terminate" to let the task exit even if "run1" was never called. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de