From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: AdaBrowse vs GNATdoc
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 01:04:48 +0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <oqud5v$1dig$1@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9OC/PY8QRnnqnNGuo4rrrw.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48291
Date: 2017-10-03T01:04:48+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I used AdaBrowse in the past but now discovered that there is also GNATdoc.

It seems that these two programs serve the same purpose.

What of the two is better? Or rather what are (dis)advantages of either?

GNATdoc is integrated with GPS. What are other (dis)advantages of either?

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org