From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,865386f3ea1dd9f0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny01.POSTED!c2bfcbcf!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [Ada] implement many new Ada 2005 features References: Message-ID: From: "Ed Falis" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Opera M2(BETA1)/8.00 (Linux, build 913) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:21:48 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.19.208.151 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trndny01 1108700508 70.19.208.151 (Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:21:48 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:21:48 EST Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8407 Date: 2005-02-18T04:21:48+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:00:16 -0600, Randy Brukardt wrote: > Well, some of us have our own Ada compilers (Janus/Ada in my case), and I > certainly hope that you are not advocating the elimination of all other > Ada > technology. I can't think of anything more certain to kill Ada than to > have > only one source for compilers - that would mean that one size would have > to > fit all, and that is unlikely to be true. > > Certainly, Janus/Ada is not going to compete in every environment with > GNAT > (it's certainly not suitable for hard real-time work, for instance), but > it > keeps alive techniques that have disappeared elsewhere: real generic code > sharing, discontiguous objects (no allocate-the-max bs here), and so on. > > I wouldn't suggest that anyone start from scratch, though, because I've > spent about 17 years of my life working on Janus/Ada (along with a > number of > other people), and that sort of investment is not something to undertake > for > most humans. And a compiler for the "easy" subset of Ada is unlikely to > be > interesting. > > Randy Brukardt Hear! Hear! - Ed