From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny08.POSTED!c2bfcbcf!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <422b6c80.1141685927@news.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: From: "Ed Falis" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Opera M2(BETA1)/8.00 (Linux, build 913) Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 04:06:31 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.19.208.151 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trndny08 1110168391 70.19.208.151 (Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:06:31 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:06:31 EST Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8792 Date: 2005-03-07T04:06:31+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:29:12 +0000, Paul E. Bennett wrote: >> Which is why other means are needed for quality software. Rigorous >> testing >> and code reviews come to mind. > Something that some people here seem not able to accept because they > believe in the absolute protectiveness of their compiler. > -- That's just plain silly - or biased. I would guess that an overwhelming number of Ada advocates also advocate testing, code reviews etc (eg I wrote AUnit). The compiler is not a replacement for these processes, but a better compiler is certainly an aid in the effort. - Ed