From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 108717,c1d77749223627c8 X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,8802fe2212b159e1 X-Google-Thread: 114809,8802fe2212b159e1 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e8296e52e7e94a6 X-Google-Attributes: gid108717,gid1108a1,gid114809,gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "Nick Roberts" Newsgroups: comp.programming,comp.object,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:46:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de OhBTEdA6WYv9VkJNWF+66gtsBOx1F7EN+Y0+kTzDsT4GT+Y3Q= User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Win32, build 3798) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.programming:8483 comp.object:5910 comp.lang.smalltalk:2623 comp.lang.ada:2904 Date: 2004-08-21T01:46:58+01:00 List-Id: On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:23:40 -0500, Programmer Dude wrote: >> I personally like Smalltalk. > > Ditto. I borrowed some of it's more interesting ideas for > my own language, BOOL. Would you say a bit more about this language (BOOL), please. -- Nick Roberts