From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,85c4b961f840b5ab
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: "Nick Roberts" <nick.roberts@acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Zero length Objects
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 23:28:22 +0100
Message-ID: <opsaql1kt8p4pfvb@bram-2>
References: <mailman.7.1089111829.416.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <opsapswqnop4pfvb@bram-2> <d_WdnWB-LYOxuXbdRVn-tA@megapath.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de Zta03Ax4vvTp7cf5h34McwAz7cJBFxfDXIieWCv86ROnaBEbA=
User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Win32, build 3798)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2089
Date: 2004-07-06T23:28:22+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 17:14:35 -0500, Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com>  
wrote:

> The ARG does not even have a consensus whether this "issue" should
> even be on the agenda, or whether it is a pathology that is not
> worth spending time on. It is unlikely that the ARG would come to
> some conclusion in time to include it in the Amendment.

Sorry, my memory is not reliable enough.

(I need to upgrade to 4-bit ECC :-)

-- 
Nick Roberts