From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc4ac82d0abec4ff X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "Nick Roberts" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Weird bug - Protected object - Gnat 3.15p win32 Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:07:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5d6fdb61.0407110729.657570af@posting.google.com> <2lf23oFbf1vfU1@uni-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de +IeEilwpDlGa+4VyJXTDnQtDs1E2QfPcHHHQqnQGOzjMohPaI= User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Win32, build 3798) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2155 Date: 2004-07-12T17:07:46+01:00 List-Id: On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:57:55 +0200, Jano wrote: > ... > In the end, I could be wrong and have discovered Yet Another > Way of Blaming the Compiler(tm) for an Own Bug ;) LOL > but I'll try to get a reproducer which could clean my > honor ;))) One suggestion that just might help you pin it down (to the compiler) is to get GNAT/GCC to produce an assembly listing. I think the relevant switch is '-S' (big S) to gcc, or '-gS' to gnatmake (but Don't Quote Me On That[TM] ;-) -- Nick Roberts