From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b20cdfabe042877c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-25 23:26:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail From: Frank Piron Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gwindows Development Team Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:26:04 +0200 Organization: 1&1 Internet AG Message-ID: References: <116a1020.0404240233.41571243@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p508b57b5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: online.de 1082960759 27320 80.139.87.181 (26 Apr 2004 06:25:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 06:25:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Opera7.23/Win32 M2 build 3227 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7501 Date: 2004-04-26T08:26:04+02:00 List-Id: 24 Apr 2004 03:33:19 -0700 Stephen McNeill wrote: > Frank Piron wrote in message > news:... >> Hi, >> who would like to work in a new Gwindows >> development team? >> who would like to manage the sources >> and coordinate work? > > There seems to have been a deafening silence on this issue, although > Frank's note was posted onto the Gnavi list, and Craig Carey made a > few comments. I feel that there are probably several people who would > like to help, including myself, but I think it's quite difficult to > take the coordination role on, given that GWindows was the effort of > one person. > > Frank, can you give us an update on any feedback you've had on this > issue from your postings? Beneath the comments from Craig Carey and what was posted here i got one very positive response from Gautier de Montmollin. Probably we will meet in Zurich (CH) soon. > I think GWindows has been such a good working Windows model that it > would be a shame to see it lose out on development, One year ago i had to choose between GtkAda, CLAW, GWindows since we had commited us already to Ada95 in a project and a windows GUI is a central part (see the development screenshot on our site) of it. I finally decided for GWindows because it is easy to understand (from our point of view) and it runs quick and stable. We found some minor bugs in some message handlers, but we fixed them in our derived types. And that is a problem i think: Be- cause we followed the rule not to touch the original source, we fixed some bugs and build many extensions only in our derived types. But to get a coherent library we should move the code up to the parents. > and there are some > fine applications out there using it. Do you have a list of such applications? I hope something can be worked > out. So do i. > Stephen Frank ---------------------------------------------------- f_r_a_n_k_a_t_k_o_n_a_d_d_o_t_n_e_t