From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety ! Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:43:13 +0200 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: <3bf7907b-2265-4314-a693-74792df531d1@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kMMTbwlmT3/jg84pSbSULw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Original-Bytes: 1894 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187181 Date: 2014-06-23T02:43:13+02:00 List-Id: Le Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:40:25 +0200, Yannick Duch=C3=AAne (Hibou57) = a =C3=A9crit: > Le Thu, 05 Jun 2014 11:13:46 +0200, Nasser M. Abbasi a= = > =C3=A9crit: >> Even though some dynamic languages will not let one at run >> time mix apples and oranges, and will give run-time error, >> I'd rather know at compile time that I am not mixing apples >> with oranges. That is much more safe. > > Which ones? Dynamic in which ways? > Forget the question, I miss=E2=80=91understood your words (I read it as = if there = was some dynamic languages able to not allow to mix apples and oranges, = = dot). -- = =E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1] =E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.= =E2=80=9D [1] [1]: Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Univers= ity