From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.roellig-ltd.de!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety !
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:41:26 +0200
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.xh07zcmwule2fv@cardamome>
References: <lmj8s6$hhp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <ln6tlg$1vc$1@dont-email.me>
 <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com>
 <ln6uv9$bk8$1@dont-email.me>
 <b22db9fb-a73d-438a-8cfd-f0bb1db70eed@googlegroups.com>
 <MPElv.491358$1w1.428312@fx03.iad> <ln77ei$de6$1@dont-email.me>
 <ln7pqb$s35$2@dont-email.me>
 <1129440363424130728.266844laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <39rmv.287397$Nf2.126763@fx01.iad>
 <1323470332424315608.501811laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 0gipH8doFnFjPXlWycyiNg.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187239
Date: 2014-06-26T00:41:26+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Fri, 13 Jun 2014 03:28:28 +0200, Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com> =
a  =

=C3=A9crit:

> Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 10-Jun-14 16:09, Luke A. Guest wrote:
>>> I have similar concerns now they are the ones 'controlling' the futu=
re  =

>>> is
>>> ASIS,
>>
>> I remember you saying something like that.
>> Is DIANA an acceptable alternative? (Its definition is not w/i the  =

>> purview of AdaCore.)
>
> No, DIANA was an attempt to standardise on a compiler intermediate
> representation (IR) for Ada compilers. It's too old, dated and there a=
re
> better IR's now.

What is an =E2=80=9CIR=E2=80=9D, please?

-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Univers=
ity