From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OpenSSL development (Heartbleed)
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 22:39:11 +0200
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.xekznl0yule2fv@cardamome>
References: <-OGdnezdYpRWFc_OnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <535297f1$0$6715$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <op.xekmrhmiule2fv@cardamome>
 <5352a585$0$6707$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <op.xekpsizsule2fv@cardamome>
 <5352caf7$0$6705$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: Y10Rmk3cmxajnL+x3h8IkQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:19455
Date: 2014-04-19T22:39:11+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Sat, 19 Apr 2014 21:13:58 +0200, Georg Bauhaus  =

<rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de> a =C3=A9crit:

> [=E2=80=A6]
>
> What does funding or not of their project have to do with
> reasons forrejection? And what does funding or not of their
> project have to do with rejection or not? And what does funding
> or not of your project have to do with (reasons for) rejection?
>
> Apple, for example, is known to be secretive about how they will
> finally react, or not react, to bug reports. They are well funded.
>
> Thus it might be an ideal situation when funding means maintenance
> and (responsive) support, but I don't see that funding entails
> the latter two.
>
> [=E2=80=A6]
>
> Right, and rhetoric is a well established human activity, too.
> Human activities is what may or may not turn the hypothesis that
> Funding =3D Quality_Assurance into a fact, in each case.

You show it does not always help, especially with some companies. OK.

Since the initial message, I have not suggested it's a mechanical rule, =
 =

just that there are things which may help and others which may make it  =

less likely (I suspect we may somewhat agree on this). Offering a  =

favourable context, surely can help. If ever you doubt it can help, just=
  =

think about these graduate schools dropping Ada courses because their  =

students want to learn something which come with paid job (not unpaid  =

volunteer job) opportunities, and this is so even in france, =E2=80=9Cth=
e country  =

of Ada=E2=80=9D (just teasing with what's in quotes=E2=80=A6 I know many=
 countries are  =

country of Ada too).

I will stop arguing on this, with this message, which will be the last o=
ne  =

:-P .

-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Univers=
ity