From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e9e2e402ed75bc3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
X-Received: by 10.66.121.201 with SMTP id lm9mr1057875pab.10.1366665464108;
        Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 bp1ni391pbd.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: aws vs ruby rails or php? how much faster?
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:17:39 +0200
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.wvyn3phdule2fv@cardamome>
References: <cb0c69fa-3393-4bbf-88af-0399057226f7@googlegroups.com>
 <87vc7fm3lp.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: MElZi/LkXjdV3cIyylAczw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.15 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Received-Bytes: 1990
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2013-04-22T23:17:39+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:22:42 +0200, Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk=
>  =

a =C3=A9crit:

> johannes falcone <visphatesjava@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> curious
>>
>> esp since template uses tasklets? multithreaded?
>
> When we (Thomas L=C3=B8cke, Kim Rostgaard Christensen and I) tested it=
, AWS
> was more than 1000 times faster than both Ruby on Rails and PHP [1].
>
> AWS is fast enough to trigger a race-condition bug in ApacheBench.
> Thomas has written about this on his blog.

What kind of request was tested with this benchmark? Was this static  =

content delivery? Dynamic content? If this was dynamic content, then how=
  =

was it defined, as there is no way to have a PHP reference file  =

implemented in Ada (too much different)?

That's not a surprise to me well designed Ada outperformed PHP and Ruby,=
  =

but I still would like more details.


-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Univers=
ity