From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,657568723e59e45b
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.66.86.102 with SMTP id o6mr8947395paz.41.1351478419495;
        Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 s9ni66480pbb.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Basic issue with dotted notation and tagged types
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:46:12 +0200
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.wmk1vaypule2fv@cardamome>
References: <op.wmjwl6mdule2fv@cardamome> <k62tl7$cro$1@dont-email.me>
 <1iwm9zh3ctl5y$.197u4rcmyrxyh$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jxc7NwPwyonMtGGqk8Yy5Q.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.02 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2012-10-22T15:46:12+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:02:16 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov  =

<mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> a =C3=A9crit:
> From a wider (and simpler) point of view a record component is just a =
 =

> pair of primitive operations (getter/setter) on the record type. That =
 =

> makes them conflicting with any user-defined primitive operations of  =

> same signature.

That's why I can't make my mind, as I feel both the same as you and the =
 =

same as J.Pierre too.

J.P Rosen wrote:
> and you are always free not to use it without losing any functionality=
.
> OTOH, you would have no other way to access a subcomponent.

-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Univers=
ity