From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,66fae8c862b81b17 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Received: by 10.66.79.40 with SMTP id g8mr1959279pax.45.1352353193853; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:39:53 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Copy vector in Ada Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:45:50 +0100 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: <1aWdnbcg_8-BzAzNnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@giganews.com> <559eb706-9bb1-496d-9034-1984d693531a@googlegroups.com> <5460fdc7-5490-4889-b771-67cc281c10c5@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kkBNy2WMHv5wPgXyHzithg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.02 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Path: 6ni68208pbd.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.mccarragher.com!news.grnet.gr!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!rt.uk.eu.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail X-Received-Bytes: 2538 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Date: 2012-11-03T00:45:50+01:00 List-Id: Le Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:03:05 +0100, Maciej Sobczak = a =C3=A9crit: >> When the assignment operator >> would not be safe to use and/or would cost too much to the = >> implementation >> to be made available safely, then Ada has well know way to exclude it= = >> from >> the interface: =E2=80=9Climited type=E2=80=9D. > > Similarly in C++ - if the assignment operator is too costly (or just = > impossible) to implement, there is a way to ban it. Really? That's a hot news to me. At least at the time I used it (~ 2000)= , = there was nothing like that, while Ada already had limited types since = long. And I'm not even sure there was a way to redefine the copy operati= on = (may be this came in a later C++ definition release, or else I forgot) o= r = anything like adjustments. >> So, yes, if =E2=80=9C:=3D=E2=80=9D is available in the interface, tha= t means it's not a = >> hack >> to use it. > > Unless the author of the type forgot to implement it properly? Not in a standard Ada package. The post is about the standard containers= , = there is not fears to have. -- = =E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1] =E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.= =E2=80=9D [1] [1]: Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Univers= ity