From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.66.74.102 with SMTP id s6mr3484516pav.21.1345680001776;
        Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 t10ni26565453pbh.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Vasiliy Molostov" <molostoff@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:00:00 +0400
Organization: None
Message-ID: <op.wjgvmarbka8ora@aspire.local>
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <wcc4noj4zof.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <jvnchp$r5c$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <wccr4rkqed5.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <op.wiml9rw3ka8ora@aspire.local>
 <502005b6$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <op.wim0pbprka8ora@aspire.local>
 <50203ca2$0$9512$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <502040c0$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <k01amo$jio$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <50677fa2-7f82-4ccc-8c56-161bf67fefe1@googlegroups.com>
 <k04a26$doi$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wius1gdbka8ora@aspire.local>
 <k0bubm$loe$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wi0fliuoka8ora@aspire.local>
 <k0eine$2h8$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wi113hf6ka8ora@aspire.local>
 <k1127v$roe$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wje1nc1hka8ora@aspire.local>
 <k13l8i$fur$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: Xw13RWgh8yxgPSv0x3+H9w.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2012-08-23T04:00:00+04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(=D0=
=B0) =D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D0=BC=
=D0=B5 Thu, 23 Aug  =

2012 02:08:12 +0400:

> "Vasiliy Molostov" <molostoff@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:op.wje1nc1hka8ora@aspire.local...
> Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com> ?????(?) ? ????? ?????? Wed, 22 =
Aug
> 2012 02:31:22 +0400:

> Attempting to "attract customers" with off-the-wall ideas of unknown  =

> value
> is a good way to go out of business. (Let me tell you about RR's  =

> management
> in the late 1980s. Actually, better leave those stories left untold.) =
One
> needs existing and/or serious potential customers that need something =
to
> justify a lot of work. (That customer could be internal of course, whi=
ch  =

> is
> where much of the HTML/HTTP support in Claw came from.)

These "off-the-wall" ideas are still the fact that any other (non-ada)  =

developers use.
But yes, above make sense, I see, much of the effort is always a bussine=
s,  =

and then a programming.
And for bussines its very important to have an identity, but even a  =

monopoly
(probably named as an unfair competitive advantage) in some utility fiel=
d.

I can only jealously take a look at neighbour's dev-tools and go to fall=
  =

in envy,
and this means that I feel my customer freedom is restricted in some  =

general ways when I use Ada. :(
This tends to affect on design decisions and on customer's health in  =

efforts he undertakes in a ways
that other non-ada developers already have left in their background  =

advances.

So I suppose it is your identity and freedom you mean indeed. and I  =

understand it.

Too late to think about monopoly, this looks more closely to isolation. =
:(  =

Unfortunately.