From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Received: by 10.204.10.88 with SMTP id o24mr2195958bko.0.1345680742789; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:12:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.106.199 with SMTP id gw7mr658505wib.0.1345680742314; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:12:22 -0700 (PDT) X-FeedAbuse: http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 88.191.116.97 Path: m12ni126129bkm.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!7no37642046wig.0!news-out.google.com!q11ni266648726wiw.1!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Vasiliy Molostov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec? Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:12:21 +0400 Organization: None Message-ID: References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <40tmogy4d1b5.1kc2gm8qfrkdu.dlg@40tude.net> <503240ed$0$6569$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <50326457$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1qril0ny3eczr$.1vlhpbrjyyb8k.dlg@40tude.net> <503375ac$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1vglgit7vnu4l$.2ytljabrhk2.dlg@40tude.net> <5033986c$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net> <5033b4d8$0$6571$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <5033ff28$0$6185$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <5034dac1$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <50350d35$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1xdzh15anpuc0.1xw8mwmojasjk$.dlg@40tude.net> <50353a25$0$6581$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1x29v2l5crksa$.17qggd3ghy94c$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: Xw13RWgh8yxgPSv0x3+H9w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Date: 2012-08-23T04:12:21+04:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0= =BB(=D0=B0) =D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C= =D0=BC=D0=B5 Thu, = 23 Aug 2012 00:08:41 +0400: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:59:36 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > >> On 22.08.12 19:44, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > Do you know a way to process PDF documents without parsing them? Then,= do > it! Parsers are everywhere, even a printers capable to print native pdfs for= = now, even X11 has an postscript interpreter, so there is no need to parse them in ada. Even embedded devices use xml parsers to parse their flashed = configuration. It is so basic as ini file parsers in '90, and nobody complain on the planet about it, except yours, Dmitry. You are already in the future, so adopt of this day as 'today' for = yourself, please! And these parsers want to have a common shared format to interchange dat= a = between each other, to bring ease into our life. -- = =D0=9D=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B2 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D1=87= =D1=82=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=BC =D0=BA=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D0=B5= =D0=B1=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B0 Opera: http://www.oper= a.com/mail/