From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: RUSSIAN,UTF8
Received: by 10.66.84.41 with SMTP id v9mr1334320pay.43.1344849112336;
        Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 g9ni53389124pbo.0!nntp.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!novia!newsfeed.yul.equant.net!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news-feed.eu.lambdanet.net!news.bcc.de!newsfeeder.ewetel.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!78.46.240.70.MISMATCH!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Vasiliy Molostov" <molostoff@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:34:30 +0400
Organization: None
Message-ID: <op.wioansg3ka8ora@aspire.local>
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <e416cb92-6ec8-4514-8fa9-c35d6432b117@googlegroups.com>
 <wcc4noj4zof.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <jvnchp$r5c$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <wccr4rkqed5.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <op.wiml9rw3ka8ora@aspire.local>
 <502005b6$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <op.wim0pbprka8ora@aspire.local>
 <50203ca2$0$9512$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <m2hasf10nc.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
NNTP-Posting-Host: Xw13RWgh8yxgPSv0x3+H9w.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Received-Bytes: 3075
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2012-08-07T17:34:30+04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(=D0=B0)=
 =D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D0=BC=D0=
=B5 Tue, 07 Aug 2012  =

14:01:27 +0400:

> Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> writes:
>
>> On 06.08.12 23:01, Vasiliy Molostov wrote:
>>> Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=
=D0=BB(=D0=B0) =D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=91=D0=BC
>>> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D0=BC=D0=B5 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:58:25 +0400=
:
>>>
>>>> When you c&p a subprogram's spec, when is that?
>>>
>>> When I use UML generator and wish to output subprogram specification=

>>> and its properties (e.g. inlining or convention) be printed in one
>>> pass (line, stanza, sentence).
>>
>> When modelling, pragmatic hints seem all the more irrelevant.  When a=

>> UML tool starts to dictate how package specifications should be made,=

>> I start to worry a little.
>
> If it's a good UML tool, you shouldn't need to look at the generated
> package specs that often (you will know what they look like from looki=
ng
> at the model). IMHO.

I doubt that any tool can be good enough, and use customized generator, =
 =

and I found that changing generator can make a necessity to review what =
is  =

generated, this greatly prevents UML tool from any dictate. I doubt that=
  =

this process relate to modelling itself, btw.


-- =

=D0=9D=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B2 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D1=87=
=D1=82=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=BC =D0=BA=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D0=B5=
 =D0=B1=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B0 Opera: http://www.oper=
a.com/mail/