From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,43d910f082521047 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Received: by 10.180.24.135 with SMTP id u7mr1350850wif.3.1344283353427; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.105.2 with SMTP id gi2mr1349402wib.4.1344283353409; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.180.205 with SMTP id bv13mr6570373qab.8.1344283342493; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.88.41 with SMTP id bd9mr1256858pab.47.1344263453081; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 07:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Path: q11ni75910537wiw.1!nntp.google.com!yt1no7777226wib.1!news-out.google.com!n2ni76352817win.0!nntp.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-C.news.volia.net!u3no8003874qai.0!news-out.google.com!c6ni65261628qas.0!nntp.google.com!r1no13015155qas.0!news-out.google.com!p10ni16353762pbh.1!nntp.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!backlog1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.panservice.it!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Vasiliy Molostov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: questions on Ada openGL binding in the GLOBE3D packages Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:12:17 +0400 Organization: None Message-ID: References: <492254f2-fb07-4949-9348-3b79694608ce@googlegroups.com> <501a6ad4$0$6553$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: Xw13RWgh8yxgPSv0x3+H9w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Original-Bytes: 2306 X-Received-Bytes: 2469 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Date: 2012-08-02T16:12:17+04:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0= =BB(=D0=B0) =D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C= =D0=BC=D0=B5 Thu, = 02 Aug 2012 15:56:03 +0400: > On 02.08.12 13:12, Egil H=C3=B8vik wrote: >>> Why not keep things standard? The standard is there. > It there a strong technical argument in favor of > using package software in stead of names implying > packages? Better visibility control? Better compilation > performance due to separation? Better change management > by modularization? Do we need use name prefixes while having high level tools to organize imported procedures in a way we decide by self? Prefix is a C "necessity", and when imported it then has nothing common = = with C. It seems, that a good binding can provide many benefits when imports bei= ng organized in an ada-way, only if you are not going to provide low-level direct 1:1 mapping to what people use in C. Is there a benefit using 1:1 C in Ada? -- = =D0=9D=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B2 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D1=87= =D1=82=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=BC =D0=BA=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D0=B5= =D0=B1=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B0 Opera: http://www.oper= a.com/mail/