From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.66.89.163 with SMTP id bp3mr1011900pab.6.1345277138213;
        Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 p10ni94656781pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Vasiliy Molostov" <molostoff@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:05:36 +0400
Organization: None
Message-ID: <op.wi78rmfska8ora@aspire.local>
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <op.wi0fliuoka8ora@aspire.local>
 <44bb5c96-a158-41c1-8e7d-ae83b2c0aca1@googlegroups.com>
 <1mchat48i3fos.1ksbz02nuzf5f$.dlg@40tude.net> <k0ei0u$214$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <rznvpohy5adk$.1of2k7nklsaam.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502b832f$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <vqx5pu5yd4m7.jlystys02zcx$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bc4df$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <sgy28ka2rw0a.119txios2lu0g$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502c149e$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ak8h9w7770bx$.ncrikznng6v3$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502cd701$0$6568$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <pstv4iafyysv$.1mq6dicsj9my0.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502d3c68$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <mhbnq53dwqt2.r7w4k1ptmxf1$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502e9039$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <40tmogy4d1b5.1kc2gm8qfrkdu.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: Xw13RWgh8yxgPSv0x3+H9w.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2012-08-18T12:05:36+04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=
=BB(=D0=B0) =D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=
=D0=BC=D0=B5 Sat,  =

18 Aug 2012 10:24:00 +0400:

>> Compare
>>
>> ....<D5><E9><F6>B.....
>>
>> to
>>
>> ....<indicator-of-meaning>123.4567</indicator-of-meaning>....
>
> By which measure?
>
> The first uses the letter 'a' 0 times. The second does it 4 times. Is =
the
> objective to minimize usage of 'A's or to maximize it?

Do you know anything about DER/BER encodings?

Dmitry, your salary output is calculated and accounted using XML (soap a=
nd  =

ofx),
could you root out this plague too?

What do you think about postscript, the same plague? is it protocol or  =

configuration?

This looks like "populating evilizm" in a field that you do not know  =

clearly, but tend to demonstrate some opposite opinion
without bringing an argument against the subject. Your typical argument =
is  =

always against the expressed
"figuration" of opposite opinion, but not the subject itself.

Returning to M. Plank (is he a programmer, btw?), it is a way of isolati=
on  =

 from current state of the art in modern data processing.