From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: RUSSIAN,UTF8 Received: by 10.216.234.135 with SMTP id s7mr413403weq.8.1345237648921; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:07:28 -0700 (PDT) Path: n2ni181729395win.0!nntp.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.138.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!plix.pl!newsfeed2.plix.pl!217.153.128.51.MISMATCH!nf1.ipartners.pl!ipartners.pl!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!news.unit0.net!news.cgarbs.de!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Vasiliy Molostov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:59:47 +0400 Organization: None Message-ID: References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <502005b6$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <50203ca2$0$9512$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <502040c0$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <50677fa2-7f82-4ccc-8c56-161bf67fefe1@googlegroups.com> <44bb5c96-a158-41c1-8e7d-ae83b2c0aca1@googlegroups.com> <1552e0d9-7cdf-4075-89d2-9a722c989c8e@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: Xw13RWgh8yxgPSv0x3+H9w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Date: 2012-08-15T03:59:47+04:00 List-Id: Shark8 =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(=D0=B0)= =D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D0=BC=D0= =B5 Wed, 15 Aug 2012 = 00:41:06 +0400: > On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:19:02 AM UTC-6, Vasiliy Molostov wrote: >> Shark8 =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(=D0=B0= ) =D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D0=BC=D0= =B5 Tue, 14 Aug = >> 2012 > Oh, I'm not saying it has an unclear purpose. I'm saying that it's a = > hard format to use nicely, to keep things correct with. Though I do pi= ty = > those who have been forced to work projects where regexes are used on = = > XML. (That seems to be a surprisingly common attempt, though it's not = = > possible as it requires something more powerful; the same as between a= n = > FSM and PDA, map to those problems, IIRC.) xml is not for human, it is interchange format, e.g. between application= s, = machines, tools etc. and has nice and rich auto-validation capabilities. > I don't think that's true. (That XML is the best choice for compilers = to = > use, I mean; I haven't had cause to use ASIS so I can't comment on it.= ) it is a reality, and not a matter to trust it's true or not. -- = =D0=9D=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B2 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D1=87= =D1=82=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=BC =D0=BA=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D0=B5= =D0=B1=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B0 Opera: http://www.oper= a.com/mail/