From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,163994d4f34e92d0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.224.177.12 with SMTP id bg12mr14339322qab.0.1343910298122;
        Thu, 02 Aug 2012 05:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 a15ni5333700qag.0!nntp.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.142.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!94.232.116.11.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Vasiliy Molostov" <molostoff@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: how to tell gnatmake to send executables to a different directory
 when compiling multi source?
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:16:31 +0400
Organization: None
Message-ID: <op.wh9axtd0ka8ora@aspire.local>
References: <jv2vu5$9tm$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <p646bl8ekmhm.qkoxmbj6j4fq$.dlg@40tude.net> <jv376e$sla$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <214bbd15-f7cb-4710-a6a7-64f37923bf4e@googlegroups.com>
 <jv3c8f$8oq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87wr1moexq.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <jv3g7h$ib4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87sjcaoa08.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <op.wh7xsqqmka8ora@aspire.local> <wcc6296cpvg.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <op.wh8gj1ckka8ora@aspire.local> <jv4tdn$mgc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: Xw13RWgh8yxgPSv0x3+H9w.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Received-Bytes: 2863
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2012-07-30T15:16:31+04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Nasser M. Abbasi <nma@12000.org> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(=D0=B0) =
=D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D0=BC=D0=B5=
 Mon, 30 Jul 2012  =

07:01:11 +0400:

> On 7/29/2012 7:20 PM, Vasiliy Molostov wrote:
>

> I see Make as the lowest common denominator. Unless GPRBUILD can
> be used to build both Ada, Java, C, C++, etc.. and can be used also
> to invoke latex to update my pdf files and HTML web pages when my
> .tex files changes, and I can use it to do my backups and all
> the other tasks I use Make for, then I do not see something better
> as a general tool.

Agree. A general tool is more useful than specialized one, of course.

> Only problem was when it comes to sending the object files
> and the .exe to different places during the build. Ada is more
> complicated and has more intermediate files generated.  If one
> does not mind keeping all files generated in the same folder as
> the sources, then the above is all what is needed for a basic
> Ada project build.

So the problem here is how GNAt generates its output, and it is not
related to make by itself, and can not turn other things into a devil.


-- =

=D0=9D=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B2 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D1=87=
=D1=82=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=BC =D0=BA=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D0=B5=
 =D0=B1=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B0 Opera: http://www.oper=
a.com/mail/