From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,25457a5aee9eaa04 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.238.65 with SMTP id vi1mr5177378pbc.7.1338416025360; Wed, 30 May 2012 15:13:45 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni1387pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Zhu Qun-Ying" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2 Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 15:14:36 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <8839eb17d97d8e1ca84b2fdbb972500c@dizum.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: QG+sVfyUW3QoXBz9uF2CgQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.64 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-05-30T15:14:36-07:00 List-Id: On Wed, 30 May 2012 13:46:45 -0700, Nomen Nescio wrote: >> >> Then don't use it. > > I don't use it. Try reading the thread instead of adding to the noise > level ;-) > >> If your code deadly need other's code to function, then respect their >> choice of license. > > I don't need anybody's code to function except the OS and on UNIX, libc > (I > usually use syscalls..) > >> You are using your definition of freedom to overtake other's thought. > > Let me see if I understand this. A guy from China is lecturing on the > topic > of freedom? It's well-understood where I come from. The Land of the FREE > and > the Home of the Brave. At least it was when I grew up... > >> I think RMS's GPL is more realistic to respect the author's will. He is >> not forcing you to use GPL for your code, he is not forcing you to use >> GPL >> code neither. > > You keep missing the point. The point is the GPL is not a free software > license. It's a viral, forcible open source license. > >> That is your definition of "free software", it is perfectly acceptable >> to >> lots of people, including me to call GPL software as free software. > > But you're damn liars, and usually socialists and atheists, so you have > no > compunction about lying, propagandizing, expropriating private property, > bullying, and killing people who get in your way, since you have no moral > compass. > > Have a nice day! If you keep saying people disagree with you as liars, you need to serious consider yourself to see a psychiatrist. Where am I coming from has nothing to do with this. I know what's freedom, and in this little earth, the only place that has total freedom that you could do what ever you want is in your dream. -- Qun-Ying