From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.68.125.233 with SMTP id mt9mr11797869pbb.5.1335613698906;
        Sat, 28 Apr 2012 04:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni108044pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!217.73.144.44.MISMATCH!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!78.46.240.70.MISMATCH!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X?
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:48:17 +0200
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.wdg4erprule2fv@douda-yannick>
References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
 <4f97bf40$0$6559$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <jn9f2o$g98$1@tornado.tornevall.net> <op.wdb9nm14ule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <jn9pjs$b8a$1@tornado.tornevall.net> <op.wdcbcfmcule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <jn9u73$mao$1@tornado.tornevall.net> <op.wdckmcyzule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <7039631.627.1335610937700.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbxz8>
NNTP-Posting-Host: Sr6dR5q5CcSp881BXZNUtw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2012-04-28T13:48:17+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:02:17 +0200, <okellogg@users.sourceforge.net> a  =

=C3=A9crit:

> On Thursday, April 26, 2012 2:50:26 AM UTC+2, Hibou57 (Yannick Duch=C3=
=AAne)  =

> wrote:
>> [...]
>> Child package are not less readable, as all kind of modularity ease
>> understanding, be it either child packages or nested packages. Howeve=
r,
>> there is another less mentioned =E2=80=94 while as much important =E2=
=80=94 requirement  =

>> of
>> Ada, which is project and source management (thus the =E2=80=9Cis sep=
arate=E2=80=9D).
>
> Which reminds me to refresh another longstanding wish:
> Allow child packages of nested packages as described at
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!msg/comp.lang.ada/RHhA1Cp=
YDcA/ArR1n1HgFRoJ
>
> -- Oliver

You reminds me I had the same wish some months ago. I agree with this on=
e.  =

I had to twist everything due to this lack, and the result was in no way=
  =

expressive (unfortunately, I don't remember anymore which package it was=
  =

exactly).

-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Univers=
ity