From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_LOCAL_HEX,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,cd8ed9115942852f
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b92b95c9b5585075
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid4f1905883f,gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feedme.ziplink.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Vinzent Hoefler" <0439279208b62c95f1880bf0f8776eeb@t-domaingrabbing.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why use C++?
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:12:36 +0200
Message-ID: <op.vz3qzahdlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
References: <fb9f787c-af06-427a-82b6-b0684e8dcbc5@s2g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <j1kaj8$dge$1@adenine.netfront.net>
 <1e292299-2cbe-4443-86f3-b19b8af50fff@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
 <j1tha5$11q5$1@adenine.netfront.net>
 <1fd0cc9b-859d-428e-b68a-11e34de84225@gz10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <9ag33sFmuaU1@mid.individual.net> <j1v17b$h98$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1d8wyhvpcmpkd.ggiui9vebmtl.dlg@40tude.net> <j203cu$q97$1@dont-email.me>
 <4573053c-23a1-4a23-9afb-fa4d297ff8c5@f41g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net zy9wO9QA6SAqVMtjx4pFGQou5zvscZGezUiovt3aYRUBcovO7c
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NHCPhplxI7cxxRU1Cr5Dh6BX0zw=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.50 (Win32)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.c++:92616 comp.lang.ada:21540
Date: 2011-08-12T15:12:36+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Stuart Redmann wrote:

> I think that we could also drop the wrapping ints at all (I consider
> them rather a kludge). If someone want wrapping semantics, he could
> still write:
> type MyType is range 0 .. 100;
> MyVar : MyType;
> MyVar = (MyVar * MyVar) mod 100;
>
> Be honest, how often do you really _want_ a wrapping int?

Thinking indices instead of pointers, quite often, actually.


Vinzent.

-- 
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.