From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,f3bebae566a54cab
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Some exciting new trends in concurrency and software design
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:34:53 +0200
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.vxj30fzzule2fv@douda-yannick>
References: 
 <8a5765ba-622a-42cd-9886-28ed7cfed31e@s17g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>
 <4dff5be5$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <9b65f3c7-caee-440f-99ed-0b257221ce58@m24g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
 <b66eac0c-c65b-4a9c-b872-dd07841ba3a8@o10g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vxiwp1onule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <1v2auyktde5q4.1wqpdg3fval5k.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.vxizencfule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <4e03bb73$0$6584$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1fb2bb30-a267-4e19-b4c6-08c35d74484a@u7g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: SY4WBM7bg4NAg3lX0bMRPQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.11 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:20993
Date: 2011-06-24T03:34:53+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:26:57 +0200, Phil Clayton  =

<phil.clayton@lineone.net> a =C3=A9crit:

> On Jun 23, 11:17 pm, Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauh...@futureapps.de>
> wrote:
>> The reason that in the context of FPLs I'm mentioning this pattern (o=
f
>> deliberately ignoring some things being a cause and expensive work
>> being an effect) is that one of these languages, the ATS language, is=

>> really highly efficient by design and also includes a proof system
>> right in the language. It has safe pointers, too. So it would seem
>> promising.  Even as a layman, I am sure there are many interesting
>> advancedfeatures in ATS.
>>
>> But as usual, some things have been ignored.
>
> I don't know about ATS but can usefully add some points...
If you want to learn bout ATS, have look there:  http://www.ats-lang.org=
/

-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D  [Ep=
igrams on  =

Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale University]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [Idem]
Java: Write once, Never revisit