From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b44a149ee4e73a99,start X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Runtime check : what about you ? Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:42:45 +0200 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: b7NxRzGgpBNKFlvVWk2OfA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.11 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19912 Date: 2011-06-17T11:42:45+02:00 List-Id: Hello, Just out of curiosity as much as because this may be worth to discuss it= = to some (at least because there are some reflex with that) : how many of= = your typically compile releases with runtime check and how many of you = typically compile releases without runtime check ? I have some things I use to read in some forum in mind, but won't tell = this. Feel free to add any specific context information with your reply ;) (I = = guess most of you will feel the need) Note: the question targets a wide audience, so please forgive if the = question seems so much obvious to some of you. -- = =E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [Ep= igrams on = Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale University] =E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.= =E2=80=9D [Idem] Java: Write once, Never revisit