From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,bb14f1c1986544fb X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Does Ada need a 'secure coding standard' as well? Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 16:04:29 +0200 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: m3iC/WWUKHAoCuA21uVLJw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.01 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:20524 Date: 2011-05-29T16:04:29+02:00 List-Id: Le Sat, 28 May 2011 20:53:25 +0200, Nasser M. Abbasi a = =C3=A9crit: > I was wondering if Ada would benefit of having something like this? > such secure programming rules customized for Ada. In the particular area of Object Oriented Design applied to High-Integri= ty = applications, there is one AdaCore worked on: www.open-do.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/HighIntegrityAda.pdf (I have this in my archive directory, but did not read it so far) I know Jean-Pierre Rosen also took part to a similar workshop, but I hav= e = no reference to this. -- = =E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [Ep= igrams on = Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale University] =E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.= =E2=80=9D [Idem] =E2=80=9Cc++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */=E2=80=9D= [Anonymous]