From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bb14f1c1986544fb
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Does Ada need a 'secure coding standard' as well?
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 17:53:40 +0200
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.vv82fqxsule2fv@douda-yannick>
References: <irrgb6$vib$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <56847815-8d29-4bd9-831c-28f1fdb95907@c26g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: R5lBI3VXyefkRJPEza5xkA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.01 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:20529
Date: 2011-05-29T17:53:40+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Sun, 29 May 2011 17:23:52 +0200, Maciej Sobczak  =

<see.my.homepage@gmail.com> a =C3=A9crit:
> Apart from those already mentionend, these two might be of interest:
> [=E2=80=A6]
Do you know some reference to papers published after the workshop  =

Jean-Pierre Rosen talked about here some months ago ? This was about OOD=
  =

in applications with hard requirement for safety. I posted one link to  =

such a document, but a pointer to this other material would still be wor=
th.


Note for people not very versed in Ada reading this thread: these papers=
  =

does not suggest Ada is not safe; on the opposite, these are all  =

recommendations to be applied when a hard step above typical safety  =

requirement one may find with everyday applications are required; none i=
s  =

required outside of so much heavy requirements.

-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D  [Ep=
igrams on  =

Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale University]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [Idem]
=E2=80=9Cc++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */=E2=80=9D=
 [Anonymous]