From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,80ae596d36288e8a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why no socket package in the standard ?
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 23:02:33 +0200
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.vv3wqj2jule2fv@douda-yannick>
References: <op.vvyoslycule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <9cb23235-8824-43f4-92aa-d2e8d10e7d8c@ct4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <4ddb5bd7$0$302$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <4ddb81b8$0$7628$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <op.vvz3hpb7ule2fv@douda-yannick> <87aaeban8a.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <op.vvz4zgm2ule2fv@douda-yannick> <8762ozahib.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <op.vv0bpcojule2fv@douda-yannick> <871uznaczz.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <015e3d6a-772a-41f8-a057-49c8b7bd80e1@w21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vv0qr4d5ule2fv@douda-yannick> <4MednVYCXuUZQEHQRVn_vwA@giganews.com>
 <op.vv1mmggpule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <6d913128-402e-47cc-ae3e-273b65198507@n10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
 <cbfc9788-b472-4c2a-b598-489b1e7ff717@g28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
 <5acc868f-6f77-4a8d-be43-b9c926eb9c08@h9g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <65dd1431-c6b2-42bd-bbab-27e1ad61a6c4@32g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vv3pm6d6ule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <4ddebc11$0$6554$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bjo5DSKSI+USgkhs6v4hsw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.01 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19503
Date: 2011-05-26T23:02:33+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Thu, 26 May 2011 22:46:09 +0200, Georg Bauhaus  =

<rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> a =C3=A9crit:
> In the case of ObjectAda or other frontends built around AdaMagic
> a program called adareg or similar will permit adding files and
> paths to the Ada libary;  files can consist of more than one
> compilation unit, no chopping is needed (even though a 1:1
> correspondence has been recommended).
Yes, I know the standard does not requires a single compilation unit per=
  =

file, while GNAT can't handle this. This may be a big enough difference =
 =

between Ada compilers. Except that, all are able to handle dependencies,=
  =

and all you need is typically a search path and a mapping from compilati=
on  =

unit name to file names. This is simpler than what many Makefiles looks =
 =

like.


> compilation unit, no chopping is needed (even though a 1:1
> correspondence has been recommended).
Recommended by whom ?

-- =

Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=E2=80=99es=
t pas pour  =

les chiens.
=E2=80=9C c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */ =E2=80=
=9D [Anonymous]